Re: Prime ideal proof
From: tj jackson (tj_at_removeofficeheadhunter.com)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: *** T. Winter: "Re: JSH:Understanding constant terms"
- Previous message: *** T. Winter: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- In reply to: Arturo Magidin: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Next in thread: Rupert: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Reply: Rupert: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Reply: Arturo Magidin: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:53:51 -0500
A ring R is called a prime ring if (0) is a prime ideal of R.
-Tj
--
"Arturo Magidin" <magidin@math.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
news:codifa$2hpa$1@agate.berkeley.edu...
> In article <e9idneM4CMZ3qTfcRVn-uQ@adelphia.com>,
> tj jackson <tj@removeofficeheadhunter.com> wrote:
> >hello all,
> >
> >I have been racking my brain for hours trying to prove the following.
> >
> >P is a prime ideal of a ring R iff R / P is a prime ring
>
> What is the definition of "Prime Ring"?
>
> --
> ======================================================================
> "It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
> what I accept as reality."
> --- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
> ======================================================================
>
> Arturo Magidin
> magidin@math.berkeley.edu
>
- Next message: *** T. Winter: "Re: JSH:Understanding constant terms"
- Previous message: *** T. Winter: "Re: JSH: Operator ambiguity, Escultura"
- In reply to: Arturo Magidin: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Next in thread: Rupert: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Reply: Rupert: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Reply: Arturo Magidin: "Re: Prime ideal proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]