The origin of quaternions
From: Glen Able (Glen.Able_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: dimension of free modules - looking for example"
- Previous message: Jeroen Boschma: "Re: High school factorization of algebraic fraction"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: José Carlos Santos: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: Roger Bagula: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: Ken Pledger: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: J.E.: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:35:21 -0000
I've read about how quaternions were invented by Hamilton. What did he find
unsatisfactory about 3 dimensional numbers?
Was it specifically that they can't be used for representing rotations in 3d
space (I'm not clear as to whether Hamilton had this purpose in mind at the
time?) Or is there some more fundamental flaw making it impossible to
sensibly define +, * operators?
thanks,
G.A.
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: dimension of free modules - looking for example"
- Previous message: Jeroen Boschma: "Re: High school factorization of algebraic fraction"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: José Carlos Santos: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: Roger Bagula: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: Ken Pledger: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Reply: J.E.: "Re: The origin of quaternions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading