Re: JSH: Being me
From: LarryLard (larrylard_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: Marc Olschok: "Re: Category Theory books"
- Previous message: Stephen J. Herschkorn: "AC question from e-mail"
- In reply to: James Harris: "JSH: Being me"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: JSH: Being me"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Nov 2004 08:53:25 -0800
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0411281037.6826d97@posting.google.com>...
> I know, many of you probably think it's horrible being me, with all
> these people calling me name, putting up nasty webpages, and spending
> so much time talking bad about me.
The unswerving self-belief (in the face of a mountain of contradictory
evidence) must be some comfort, I imagine.
>
> Some of you are in your own little world
Project much?
> and maybe still think I'm
> wrong, while some of you realize that I'm right and STILL wouldn't
> want to be me considering how much opposition my results have faced
> and are likely to face.
>
> But hey, it's actually fun!
Must have an almost narcotic effect, that level of self-belief.
>
> Like I haven't just done arguing with people on math or even just math
> research as I have an open source project on SourceForge, and I have
> made some friends (believe it or not) in a few Internet communities.
You should be careful making friends on the Internet James, there's a
lot of weirdos out there.
>
> I *thought* I could use the Internet in a groundbreaking way to
> introduce major results but here I am WAITING ON A JOURNAL, when I
> said in the past that I wouldn't even use journals!
You'll be waiting a while, I'd wager.
>
> :-)
>
> Live and learn.
If only you would!
>
> In any event, I also get to go over my own mathematical work, and
> enjoy talking about it as you might have noticed with me starting new
> threads--yet again--going over the arguments in different ways.
You? Starting new threds? Can't say I'd spotted any, no...
>
> Different looks. Perspective.
>
> But, on to something practical, as I've been looking at BitTorrent
> clients while I'm doing downloads, and I see the download speeds
> hopping all over the place as the clients--I guess--use various
> algorithms to try and figure out what's the best connection to make.
>
> Anyone here know anything about those algorithms? I'm thinking maybe
> I might make my own BitTorrent client, or go in and fiddle with the
> algorithms on the one I have as I have Azureus. But it's an idle
> thought, so why not toss it on sci.math?
>
> Any of you know anything about the algorithms being used in BitTorrent
> clients?
<http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=BitTorrent+algorithm>
You have Internet access, learn how to use it. Oh wait, I forgot,
you're pathologically incapacle of learning.
-- Larry Lard Replies to group please
- Next message: Marc Olschok: "Re: Category Theory books"
- Previous message: Stephen J. Herschkorn: "AC question from e-mail"
- In reply to: James Harris: "JSH: Being me"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: JSH: Being me"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]