Re: mathematics
From: Neil W Rickert (rickert+nn_at_cs.niu.edu)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: James Harris: "JSH: Just playing"
- Previous message: James Harris: "JSH: Final exam"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:14:03 +0000 (UTC)
examachine@gmail.com (Eray Ozkural exa) writes:
>Nothing transcends the objectivity of physics.
There were things believed true in physics, prior to Einstein's
relativity, that are now considered false. Which had the
transcendent objectivity? The "before" physics, or the "after"
physics?
We could come up with other examples before and after QM.
------
Don't get me wrong. I am not criticizing physics here. But I think
you need to be careful with terms such as "transcendent objectivity."
- Next message: James Harris: "JSH: Just playing"
- Previous message: James Harris: "JSH: Final exam"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading