Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results
From: jeffc (nobody_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 12/01/04
- Next message: Lord of Chaos\(Suresh Devanathan\): "Re: the beautiful TOE"
- Previous message: jeffc: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:24:21 -0500
"David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
news:x5r7mbgf45.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
> "jeffc" <nobody@nowhere.com> writes:
>
> > If you're talking about ballot papers that are small relative to the
> > size of the box, then I agree. Where I vote, the ballots are very
> > large (11x14) and stack right up in the machine.
>
> That sounds completely lunatic. While there are some ballots with an
> even quite larger size in some regions here, you have to fold them
> small enough to make them fit the slot in the ballot box. They don't
> stack neatly from there.
Ours go into an optical reader - they don't get dropped in a slot like back in
the 1800s!
- Next message: Lord of Chaos\(Suresh Devanathan\): "Re: the beautiful TOE"
- Previous message: jeffc: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Reply: David Kastrup: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
