The joy of plain text
From: The World Wide Wade (waderameyxiii_at_comcast.remove13.net)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Embedding theorem and uniqueness?"
- Previous message: *** T. Winter: "Re: fermat"
- In reply to: G. A. Edgar: "Re: analysis question"
- Next in thread: Gerry Myerson: "Re: The joy of plain text"
- Reply: Gerry Myerson: "Re: The joy of plain text"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: The joy of plain text"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:02:02 -0800
In article <301120040755374483%edgar@math.ohio-state.edu.invalid>,
"G. A. Edgar" <edgar@math.ohio-state.edu.invalid> wrote:
> > Please, no TEX when you post here; this is a plain text newsgroup.
>
> On the contrary, this is a mathematics newsgroup, where TeX is quite
> common.
On the contrary? Your statement does not contradict anything I wrote. And
I'm not sure what "common" is supposed to imply: Poorly stated questions
are much more common on sci.math than is TeX; that is hardly an argument
for them.
I was under the impression that sci.math is a plain text ng. Isn't this
forum for the worldwide mathematics community at large? This would include
many who are unfamiliar with TeX: kids, high-school teachers, all sorts of
amateurs and hobbyists, engineers, math Ph.D.s who got their degrees
decades ago and are in other fields now, etc. I once knew TeX well enough
to write a few papers in it, but I left academia years ago and today I much
prefer plain old text to TeX on sci.math.
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Embedding theorem and uniqueness?"
- Previous message: *** T. Winter: "Re: fermat"
- In reply to: G. A. Edgar: "Re: analysis question"
- Next in thread: Gerry Myerson: "Re: The joy of plain text"
- Reply: Gerry Myerson: "Re: The joy of plain text"
- Reply: Herman Rubin: "Re: The joy of plain text"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]