Re: Deviration Of The Spectrom Deu To f(t).d(t - T)?????
From: Checkmate (LunaticFringe_at_The.Edge)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: darrenn: "Re: Help soving this problem?"
- Previous message: Steven: "Re: Abstract Algebra"
- In reply to: Airy R. Bean: "Re: Deviration Of The Spectrom Deu To f(t).d(t - T)?????"
- Next in thread: Wilbert Dijkhof: "Re: Deviration Of The Spectrom Due To f(t).d(t - T)?????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:28:24 -0800
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:03:29 -0000, Airy R. Bean put forth the notion
that...
> Nothing wrong with top-posting.
That's what clueless newbies always say.
> It is the preferred method, because you don't have to
> page down through much repeated and already-seen
> history.
>
> Bottom posted articles following such a trend tend to be
> skipped over unread.
>
> "Torkel Franzen" <torkel@sm.luth.se> wrote in message
> news:vcb1xebptu4.fsf@beta19.sm.ltu.se...
> > "Airy R. Bean" <me@privacy.net> writes:
> >
> > > In a previous post.
> >
> > Top-posting makes the whole thing impractical.
>
>
>
-- Checkmate Copyright © 2004 all rights reserved
- Next message: darrenn: "Re: Help soving this problem?"
- Previous message: Steven: "Re: Abstract Algebra"
- In reply to: Airy R. Bean: "Re: Deviration Of The Spectrom Deu To f(t).d(t - T)?????"
- Next in thread: Wilbert Dijkhof: "Re: Deviration Of The Spectrom Due To f(t).d(t - T)?????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]