inverse modulos
From: Johnathan Doe (No-spam-here-johnathan_doe_at_!!!NOSPAMTHANKS!!!fastmail.com.au)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: k_over_hbarc_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Jesus christ What's going on?"
- Previous message: gds_at_best.cut.here.com: "Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Next in thread: Pawel Gladki: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Reply: Pawel Gladki: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Reply: mensanator_at_aol.com: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Maybe reply: Don Coppersmith: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Reply: Chip Eastham: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:17:27 +1100
If two numbers x and m are relatively prime, so that gcd(x, m) = 1 is
true, then x has a unique multiplicative inverse modulo m, a, so that ax
= 1 (mod m).
Knowing only the multiplicative inverse, a modulo m, and m, is it
possible to find x?
Is it true that a*x - 1 = k*m, for some k, possibly negative? Or
multiple k's? How to find the multiple k's so that x could be found?
Is that possible at all, so that the candidate k's can be found knowing
only the inverse a modulo m and m?
If there is no single way to find it, is there a reasonable trial and
error process to go through to find x given a and m?
What I suppose I am saying is, what is the relationship between x and
its inverse a modulo m?
Well, if you caught all that, hope you can help me out :)
Cheers
Johnathan
- Next message: k_over_hbarc_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Jesus christ What's going on?"
- Previous message: gds_at_best.cut.here.com: "Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Next in thread: Pawel Gladki: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Reply: Pawel Gladki: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Reply: mensanator_at_aol.com: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Maybe reply: Don Coppersmith: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Reply: Chip Eastham: "Re: inverse modulos"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|