Re: What is a proof, exactly?
From: Jasper Stein (J.J.Stein.Stein_at_cs.cs.ru.ru.nl.nl)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: jeffc: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Jesus christ What's going on?"
- In reply to: Josh Purinton: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Reply: Chergarj: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Reply: Josh Purinton: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:56:38 +0000
Josh Purinton wrote:
> In article <992b156f.0411232355.74c1829c@posting.google.com>,
> George Greene <greeneg@cs.unc.edu> wrote:
>> [A proof] can't be required and empty at the same time. It can't at
>> the same time be both necessarily present AND absent.
>
> Good point. I was trying to say that x is a theorem just when
> ProofPredicate(prf,x) is true, and ProofPredicate may be such that it is
> true for those arguments even if prf is something that we might consider
> empty, such as is the empty list or the empty tree.
>
>> [...] FS(.,.) is never a proof of anything. That is NOT the sort of
>> thing that a proof can be.
>
> Right; that was sloppy of me. I should have written ``nil might be a
> valid proof of "5=5"'' (according to my (idiosyncratic?) definition of a
> formal system as a ``"finitistic" function FS(Prf,x) that distinguishes
> valid proofs of x from invalid proofs of x'').
This is somewhat strange - does this mean that one (formal) proof can prove
several things? At least I suppose that if <> proves 5=5 then it also
proves e.g. 27=27.
(It seems that I'm missing some of the posts to the newsgroup - I haven't
seen George Greene's original post)
Jasper
-- The problem with having an open mind is that people toss in garbage
- Next message: jeffc: "Re: Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results"
- Previous message: Randy Poe: "Re: Jesus christ What's going on?"
- In reply to: Josh Purinton: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Next in thread: Chergarj: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Reply: Chergarj: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Reply: Josh Purinton: "Re: What is a proof, exactly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|