Ozkural: his abuse continues was Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 12/02/04
- Next message: patty: "Re: mathematics"
- Previous message: Mark Tarka: "Re: Jesus christ What's going on?"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Ozkural: his abuse continues was Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Ozkural: his abuse continues was Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:08:59 +0000
Eray "Are there integers with an infinite number of digits?" Ozkural wrote:
> I wouldn't be surprised if the Wikipedia article were written by
> people, like Harris or Chapman, who couldn't distinguish unbounded
> from infinite.
Need I say more?
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: patty: "Re: mathematics"
- Previous message: Mark Tarka: "Re: Jesus christ What's going on?"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Ozkural: his abuse continues was Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Ozkural: his abuse continues was Re: Lambda Calculus and Turing Equivalence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|