Re: What is a proof, exactly?
From: Han de Bruijn (Han.deBruijn_at_DTO.TUDelft.NL)
Date: 12/03/04
- Next message: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Set inclusion and membership"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Jasper Stein: "What is a proof, exactly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:32:21 +0100
Jasper Stein wrote:
> - Suppose aliens gave us a pack of paper, full of english text and
> mathematical symbols, ending in "... and hence the Riemann Hypothesis is
> proved. QED." Suppose also that this text was so intricate and so involved
> and so convoluted that no one would be able to understand it in full. Does
> this pack of paper constitute a proof?
The aliens have landed! Actually, there does _exist_ such a (would-be?)
proof here on earth:
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~branges/
Han de Bruijn
- Next message: Han de Bruijn: "Re: Set inclusion and membership"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Jasper Stein: "What is a proof, exactly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]