Re: JSH: Without a trace

From: I.M.Davidson (sttscitrans_at_tesco.net)
Date: 12/04/04 

Date: 4 Dec 2004 11:26:15 -0800

jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0412040702.1058c65a@posting.google.com>...
> Some of you may have noticed that I'm talking about abstractions now
> at higher and higher levels, which I think should help.

I'm begging for enlightnment.

> For instance, given a multiple of a polynomial it has been well
> accepted that you can divide that multiple off without leaving a
> trace.

You are obviously referring to those
wicked but rational criminal rings
who go about stripping integer polynomials of
their factors leaving no finger prints,
DNA or other forensic evidence.
It's always a shock when your polynomials are
tampered with in this way.
However, more brutal irrationals tend
to leave polys hideously mutilated
and because of the resistance of the victim
the perpetrator's blood and other bodily
fluids can be left at the scene. Let's hope the
forces of law and order can at least capture these
irrational miscreants.

Quantcast