Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion.
From: HERC777 (herc777_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/04/04
- Next message: Cassandra Thompson: "Magnitude and area of a parallelogram"
- Previous message: Timothy Golden: "tetrahedral-cartesian transform"
- In reply to: tinyurl.com/uh3t: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Next in thread: tinyurl.com/uh3t: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Reply: tinyurl.com/uh3t: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Dec 2004 15:38:24 -0800
Right!
My point is the diagonal you made, you call it unique yet it has No
Unique Initial Segment.
The length of all initial segments on an infinite list is unbounded.
Therefore, the diagonal sequence is already present on the list to
infinite number of flips.
this is also true for 0.33333.. on the list
0.3
0.33
0.333
...
0.3333... has No Unique Initial Segment.
Why is 0.3333.. not on that list?
Why is the diag HHHH.. not on the random list?
Herc
- Next message: Cassandra Thompson: "Magnitude and area of a parallelogram"
- Previous message: Timothy Golden: "tetrahedral-cartesian transform"
- In reply to: tinyurl.com/uh3t: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Next in thread: tinyurl.com/uh3t: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Reply: tinyurl.com/uh3t: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
