Re: JSH: Fool all of the people, all of the time?

From: Richard Henry (rphenry_at_home.com)
Date: 12/05/04


Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:46:54 -0800


"James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c65f87.0412050552.40525729@posting.google.com...
> imaginatorium@despammed.com (Brian Chandler) wrote in message
news:<f2c35871.0412042036.542cbcd6@posting.google.com>...
> >
> > "What does 'properly a unit' mean?"
> >
> > Only you can answer.
> >
>
> That's an old game of trying to cause major arguments over the use of
> some term or other, as I now simply shift from usage that sci.math'ers
> find easily works to provoke confusion.
>
> What I find fascinating is that *clearly* some of you have worked
> rather hard to confuse the issue, hide the reality, and fight for
> arguments that just don't work, when I know that I learned years ago
> that it's just futile in mathematics to do those things.
>
> And now some of you may finally be learning why, as I simply adjust
> explanations, and soon enough people will realize that you had to
> understand how it all worked to confuse them so well, and then they
> probably won't appreciate your efforts.
>
> After all, mathematics is objective in many ways. Sure some of you
> have personalized it, so that you can attack it as if it were mine.
>
> But it's like if you hated Pythagoras and went after the Pythagorean
> Theorem.
>
> You're not doing the world any favors, and fighting a battle you will
> lose.
>
> These things have happened before, history repeats itself, and for
> some reason there are people like some of you who step out to fight
> what is mathematically true, for personal reasons.

The question was "What does 'properly a unit' mean?"

In what you wrote above, where is your answer?

>From reading criticisms of Ms. Nora Baron and others, it appears that your
fundamental (remaining) problem is finding a value for your sample
polynomials at x = 0, and then extending that result to all values of x.
How have you answered that?



Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Take a breath
    ... decided to send some emails claiming the paper ... Of course the editors shouldn't have withdrawn your paper. ... variables or to confuse them on functions, ... I'm trying to show you how the mathematics actually works. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Fool all of the people, all of the time?
    ... I focused on non-polynomial factorization itself, ... It's actually neat in that I discovered the prime counting function ... understand how it all worked to confuse them so well, ... mathematics is objective in many ways. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: dot meaning
    ... |> Now, I teach mathematics, not computer science - so it may well be ... |> that my intuitions about what will confuse newbies are off the mark. ... At least, among experienced Lisp users, it is so. ... | a way to confuse a newbie with detail he is not ready to handle. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: K calculus OK?
    ... > You'll only confuse the kiddies with your own and Bilge's ... > misunderstanding of mathematics. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Best way to config computer for photoshop
    ... >> Your personal reasons to use partitions do not interest me. ... But don't confuse what interests you with what matters. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.graphics.photoshop)