Re: .99999... still=/= 1
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Fool all of the people, all of the time?"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Next in thread: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Reply: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Reply: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 03:10:17 GMT
S. Enterprize Company wrote:
>
> And this is incorrect as found in the foundations of math itself, not just
> you. The Partial Sums never precisely equals the total value of the series. It
> is only a rounded off approximate value that can be used. I simply corrected
> their mistake.
Putzarooni. Do you know what the phrase converge to a limit means?
Bob Kolker
- Next message: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Fool all of the people, all of the time?"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Next in thread: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Reply: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Reply: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|