Re: Graph?
From: David W. Cantrell (DWCantrell_at_sigmaxi.org)
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: Putnam Exam 2004 -- Questions"
- Previous message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- In reply to: mike3: "Graph?"
- Next in thread: mike3: "Re: Graph?"
- Reply: mike3: "Re: Graph?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 06 Dec 2004 13:01:03 GMT
"mike3" <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> What does the graph of Imag(x^x) for x < 0 look like?
Wasn't that already answered in your recent thread "The function x^x"?
There, I suggested that, for x < 0, Imag(x^x) be rewritten as
(-x)^x * sin(pi*x)
which can be easily graphed for x < 0. Doing so, you will see that the
graph oscillates about the negative x-axis with rapidly decreasing
amplitude as we move farther from the origin. Of course, the graphs of
-(-x)^x and (-x)^x form an envelope for the graph in question, and the
oscillation is due to the sine factor.
David
- Next message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: Putnam Exam 2004 -- Questions"
- Previous message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- In reply to: mike3: "Graph?"
- Next in thread: mike3: "Re: Graph?"
- Reply: mike3: "Re: Graph?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|