Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics

From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 12/13/04 

Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:56:06 GMT

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:38:34 GMT, "AngleWyrm"
<no_spam_anglewyrm@hotmail.com> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>"Lester Zick" <lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>news:41bd1833.17476667@netnews.att.net...
>
>> >Science argues that A is C because of a "A=C grant". B is window dressing.
>
>> >Mysticism just postulates that A is C because C is unknowable and makes us
>> >afraid and so all things including B must be subject to it.
>
>> > Art just argues that A is anything I want it to be.. just watch and listen!
>
>> > Physics argues that A is C cuz it just got a new A=C scope.
>
>> > Philosophy argues that A is A, B is B and C is C. They are all part of an
>> >didactic letternomic set with has been assigned arbitrary cultural and
>> >cognitive importance... at least that's what it says here... in this book.
>
>I argue that "=" is an emergant generalization of distinguishing dissimilarity
>between A and B, a conceptual positive to a physical negative.

I believe I've argued myself along similar lines.

Regards - Lester

Quantcast