Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics
From: Wolf Kirchmeir (wwolfkir_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 12/14/04
- Next message: Zdislav V. Kovarik: "Re: Determinant with trigonometry"
- Previous message: Justin: "Re: JSH: But what if it works?"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:23:24 -0500
Lester Zick wrote:
[...]>
>
> I'm mostly interested in definitions that hold true all the time.
They do, Lester, they do. By definition. Whether a definition refers to
anything real is another question.
- Next message: Zdislav V. Kovarik: "Re: Determinant with trigonometry"
- Previous message: Justin: "Re: JSH: But what if it works?"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]