Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 12/14/04
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: But what if it works?"
- Previous message: Helmut Richter: "Re: Random Rational?"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!"
- Next in thread: Mensanator: "Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!"
- Reply: Mensanator: "Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:11:14 +1000
"David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in
> zendo_joystick_ankh_hero@yahoo.com.br (Bruno Beam) writes:
>
> > There is NOTHING that Santa cannot prove !!!!
> >
> > Wish for a proof for Christmas and you'll get it!
>
> We already had a thread discussing acceptance of God's proofs in this
> group recently. I vainly refer to
>
> Message-ID: <x51xgk7ylg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
>
> after which it petered out. Go back from there.
>
I'm God and I have numerous proofs. Everyone thinks I'm joking year after year
with proof of god posted in front of them..... oh haha.
NOT JOKING..... serious thread.
MY NAME:
Graham Andrew Cooper Groom Android Computer ROBOSTUD ADAM EVEFINDER
Jennifer Brooks gender water EVE
add the vowels in my name = 7
add the consonants in my name = 7
initial 7 G god
initials GC 73
born 7/3
born in Melbourne, NewChurch St.
Man 7 G ala James Bond
Woman 10 (J) ala Bo Derek
here's one proof, just answer the questions honestly working them out in your head,
I've had to state that 1,000 times already on usenet, everyone wants to find some
interpretations that makes it void. ...what if I answer it wrong then that means
it doesn't work so its not a proof... what if i look up the answers.... 1000 excuses
>Statistical Anomaly Proof Of God.
>
>This is the simplest proof of God you will ever see, and it takes 3 minutes for anyone
>to verify.
>
>
>----1---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Randi will test you when you properly apply to be tested. Sign up here:
>
>http://www.randi.org/research/challenge.html
>
>----2----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>It really all depends on the situation.
>
>----3----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>If ever I actually found myself in that situation, I'd hold it upright,
>with the intent of attacking my assailant's knife hand.
>
>
>--ANSWER OPTIONS---------------
>A cliff86
>B Rust
>C Shanx
>D NormDePloom
>E Rich Shewmaker
>F CNote
>G Jeff
>H See You In Hell My Friend.
>I Someone
>J Greg Neill
>
>
>Which author best fits each post?
>
>You have 1 chance in 1,000 of getting this quiz right.
>In theory people could still solve it with 100 random alias' options, breaking million to 1
>odds of these 3 posts all occuring on the same day. Each post is a large coincidence
>and they all happened one one day. No non paranormal person can replicate this
>collation of posts.
>
>
>WHY IS IT PROOF OF GOD.
>1/ the posts can be checked in google that they are legitimate
>2/ all the replies are to me on 02/02/2003 (space shuttle disaster)
>3/ on 02/02/2002 one year before I yelled to a dozen newsgroups
> "proof of God 0202 2002" using this remark
>
>'replies to me are indicative of their alias, part of deity'.
>
>
>
>
>LIVE WITNESSES
>
>
>P A R A N O R M A L W I T N E S S E S
>
>(alt.magic)
>>"Trent" wrote
>> Yay! Bravo!
>>
>> The only possible explanation is, of course, that I have latent psychic
>> powers that allow me to be 100% accurate 50% of the time when I have to
>> choose from two choices!
>>
>> Seriously though, good work. I want more Usenet magic!
>
>
>
>(sci.skeptic)
>>"Danny Kodicek" wrote
>>> I *will* include some comments, but I'll add some spoiler space in case
>>> anyone is really wanting to give it a go.
>>>
>>> My guess is
>>> 1c, 2a, 3b
>>
>>And the spoiler answer follows...
>>Pretty good, Herc! I was spot on with my guess.
>>Danny
>
>
>
>(alt.astrology)
>>One other thing - just to verify (not that that's really necessary,
>>I am sure) your channeling abilities:
>>
>>Thanks very much.
>>Eric
>
>
>(alt.sci.physics)
>>Herc - "strongly related" aha (Hercules)! and the detective work (Poirot).
>>Two for one mon ami!
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>> In alt.sci.physics, (that's where the proof is now LIVE)
>>> I have no less than 8 consecutive people posting messages
>>> that are ~strongly related~ to their name (alias).
>
>
>(sci.skeptic)
>>KERSPLOSH wrote:
>>
>>>> What if some unidentified paranormal power can only beat odds of one in a
>>>> thousand? Then it does not exist?
>>>
>>>If you can do this consistantly, then we just calculate how many times you need
>>>to do it to come up with odds of a million to one, and you're in.
>>
>>If it's that easy I would think that Herc could win.
>
>
>(sci.skeptic)
>>> 1) Which one of these actually went by his/her first name?
>>>
>>> a) My mother
>>> b) my mother-in-law
>>> c) my father-in-law
>>
>> b
>Mmmmm-mmmm! Wholesome humble pie!
>I could try lying to save face but I have to admit it:
>Four out of four right.
>Eric
>
>
>(aus.tv)
>From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
>Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
>Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
>answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
>
>
- Next message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: But what if it works?"
- Previous message: Helmut Richter: "Re: Random Rational?"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!"
- Next in thread: Mensanator: "Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!"
- Reply: Mensanator: "Re: Santa Claus is the god of math !!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
