Category Theory
From: Douglas Eagleson (eagleson2004123_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: afis: "Help Needed"
- Previous message: Dan Weiner: "Re: PROOF that 0.99999... = 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Dec 2004 08:20:08 -0800
A set exists and its cause is the categorified set. Meaning the next
abstracted set is always in relation to the set of interest.
What is debated is the exact relation of set to its abstracted form.
And to call the symbol in predicate the next abstraction without
debating, is a common means of learning incorrectly, category theory.
A foundational relation is postulated to exist, such that all relations
may be stated.
And in the realm of science, objective relations are used to solve this
long standing mystery. Only relations testable in science are to be
given to mathematics.
IN predicate, set A -> a.
And here the relation denoted by, ->, is the correct one.
A good teacher will also allow the relations actual cognition, except
it is as a trained knowledge, without hardly any symbolic expression to
support. Meaning, a good teacher is critical to the good user of the
science of category theory.
In order to give words to the symbol, ->, here is its definition.
"->, a set exists independently of its contents, and the cause to
contents is likewise independent of existence."
Making the complex relationship of existence to value.
And the meaning of dependency and independency identical.
A relation of true objective causality exists in nature such that the
relation of existence to value is found always independent!!!!!
A foundational nonlinear relation is called the, ->.
Douglas Eagleson- Gaitherbsurg, MD USA
- Next message: afis: "Help Needed"
- Previous message: Dan Weiner: "Re: PROOF that 0.99999... = 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
