Re: Science, Philosophy, Mysticism, Art, Mathematics, and Physics

From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 12/19/04


Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:33:37 -0600

Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
> robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Lester Zick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, QM doesn't explain the somehow, which is what a
>>> mechanics is supposed to do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tell me. How does a Lagrangian formulation of mechanics explain
>> anything? What it does is imply some laws which when applied produce
>> good predictions. What makes you think there are entities behind the
>> appearences that behave mechanically? What evidence do you have.
>> Classical physics which was solidly mechanics is an empirical failure
>> which is why we have quantum theory and relativity. The truly
>> mechanical theories such as statistical mechanics are heuristics, not
>> fundemental models of reality. QM works. Relativity works. What more
>> do you want?
>>
>> Bob Kolker
>>
>
>
> Lester want to be recognised as the one who explains the _reasons why_
> everything is the way it is. But just why "mecvhanism" should be the
> reasons why, he can't say; nor why the mechnaism of "differences between
> doifferences" is the fundamental mechanism.
>
> IOW, Lester can't accept that things are simply what they are, and the
> best we can do is describe how things happen. IOW, he can't accept what
> I call the Fundamnetal Ignorance Theorem (first expressed by Bertrand
> Russell): When we know that we say is true, we don't know what it means.
> When we know what mean, we don't know if it's true.

To me, Fundamental Ignorance is that willed ignorance that you
display when you argue *against* explaining the _reasons why_
things are the way they are. An excellent reply for a novice
hoping for entry into the priesthood of Scientific Faith.

BTW, I prefer to judge Lester by his own words and not by your
revisionist interpretations of them.

<snip>

-- 
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the 
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally 
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
     -- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"	


Relevant Pages