Re: Is zero even or odd?
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 12/22/04
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Previous message: Hauke Reddmann: "Focus of a Conic"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is zero even or odd?"
- Next in thread: Shawn Corey: "Re: Is zero even or odd?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:59:18 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Franz Heymann <notfranz.heymann@bt
openworld.com> wrote (in <cq7j61$6gm$2@sparta.btinternet.com>) about 'Is
zero even or odd?', on Mon, 20 Dec 2004:
>There is no lack of rigour in the definition of infinity. Read anbout
>the work of Cantor, Dedekind and others.
Indeed: I was referring to the lack of rigour in '1/0 = infinity'.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Randy Poe: "Re: .99999... still=/= 1"
- Previous message: Hauke Reddmann: "Focus of a Conic"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is zero even or odd?"
- Next in thread: Shawn Corey: "Re: Is zero even or odd?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
