sci.math
By Thread

8864 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian SDR (01/31/05)
  • Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian robert j. kolker (01/31/05)
• JSH: Playing with infinities jstevh_at_msn.com (01/31/05)
  • Re: JSH: Playing with infinities rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/31/05)
  • Re: Playing with infinities KeithK (01/31/05)
• Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled jstevh_at_msn.com (01/31/05)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled ošin (01/31/05)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled Tim Peters (01/31/05)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/31/05)
  • Re: Theory versus implemention, I'm puzzled David Eather (01/31/05)
• Hom_R(R,R) question, rings Tony (01/31/05)
  • Re: Hom_R(R,R) question, rings Ron Sperber (01/31/05)
    • Re: Hom_R(R,R) question, rings Tony (01/31/05)
    • Re: Hom_R(R,R) question, rings Ron Sperber (01/31/05)
  • Re: Hom_R(R,R) question, rings Arturo Magidin (01/31/05)
    • Re: Hom_R(R,R) question, rings Tony (01/31/05)
• Question on Lie Groups Tony (01/31/05)
  • Re: Question on Lie Groups igor.kh_at_gmail.com (01/31/05)
  • Re: Question on Lie Groups Ted Hwa (01/31/05)
• Online factorizer Larry Hammick (01/31/05)
• Fermat's last theorem varathk03_at_iimb.ernet.in (01/30/05)
• sequence basis tsmith (01/30/05)
• Factoring using Lehman's method Christian Bau (01/30/05)
  • Re: Factoring using Lehman's method Phil Carmody (01/31/05)
• circumscribing a circle around a triangle - proof sought Sean McIlroy (01/30/05)
  • Re: circumscribing a circle around a triangle - proof sought Ignacio Larrosa Cańestro (01/30/05)
  • Re: circumscribing a circle around a triangle - proof sought carlos_at_colorado.edu (01/31/05)
• The generality of mathematics Jamie Vicary (01/30/05)
  • Re: The generality of mathematics Arturo Magidin (01/30/05)
  • Re: The generality of mathematics robert j. kolker (01/30/05)
• Defining infinitely differentiable function Ioannis (01/30/05)
• Does UBasic Work With Windows XP? Kaimbridge (01/30/05)
  • Re: Does UBasic Work With Windows XP? Ignacio Larrosa Cańestro (01/30/05)
  • Re: Does UBasic Work With Windows XP? Lynn Kurtz (01/30/05)
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 209) John Baez (01/30/05)
• JSH: Pure math, sci.math and reptiles jstevh_at_msn.com (01/30/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pure math, sci.math and reptiles David C. Ullrich (01/30/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pure math, sci.math and reptiles Victor Eijkhout (01/30/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pure math, sci.math and reptiles guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (01/30/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pure math, sci.math and reptiles Nora Baron (01/30/05)
• bounded sequences imply limsup(x+y) < limsup(x) + limsup(y) someone_at_somedomain.com.invalid (01/30/05)
  • Re: bounded sequences imply limsup(x+y) < limsup(x) + limsup(y) The World Wide Wade (01/30/05)
• Re: · · · Have You Heard The Good News? · · · Tonico (01/30/05)
  • Re: · · · Have You Heard The Good News? · · · Phil Carmody (01/30/05)
    • Re: Q_=B7_=B7_Have_You_Heard_The_?= Good News? · · · Mike Oliver (01/30/05)
      • Re: · · · Have You Heard The Good News? · · · Phil Carmody (01/30/05)
    • Re: · · · Have You Heard The Good News? · · · David C. Ullrich (01/30/05)
• volume optimization Fabrizio (01/30/05)
• entropy minimization not too bright (01/30/05)
  • Re: entropy minimization Saint Cad (01/30/05)
• 0 * X = null? snafu (01/30/05)
  • Re: 0 * X = null? A N Niel (01/30/05)
    • Re: 0 * X = null? snafu (01/30/05)
      • Re: 0 * X = null? Jussi Piitulainen (01/30/05)
      • Re: 0 * X = null? Saint Cad (01/30/05)
      • Re: 0 * X = null? Owen (01/30/05)
  • Re: 0 * X = null? Richard Cavell (01/30/05)
  • Re: 0 * X = null? Dwayne (01/30/05)
  • Re: 0 * X = null? Oscar Lanzi III (01/30/05)
    • Re: 0 * X = null? Hero (01/30/05)
      • Re: 0 * X = null? snafu (01/30/05)
  • Re: 0 * X = null? The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
    • Re: 0 * X = null? mensanator_at_aol.compost (01/30/05)
      • Re: 0 * X = null? The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
• Ring ideals Tonico (01/30/05)
  • Re: Ring ideals Jannick Asmus (01/30/05)
• Drawing graphs by hand johngcarlsson_at_gmail.com (01/30/05)
  • Re: Drawing graphs by hand matt271829-news_at_yahoo.co.uk (01/30/05)
  • Re: Drawing graphs by hand bernard massé (01/30/05)
    • Re: Drawing graphs by hand johngcarlsson_at_gmail.com (01/30/05)
      • Re: Drawing graphs by hand matt271829-news_at_yahoo.co.uk (01/30/05)
      • Re: Drawing graphs by hand johngcarlsson_at_gmail.com (01/30/05)
• Diophantine equation Arne Smeets (01/30/05)
  • Re: Diophantine equation Oscar Lanzi III (01/30/05)
    • Re: Diophantine equation Ignacio Larrosa Cańestro (01/30/05)
    • Re: Diophantine equation Oscar Lanzi III (01/30/05)
  • Re: Diophantine equation Arne Smeets (01/30/05)
  • Re: Diophantine equation sttscitrans_at_tesco.net (01/31/05)
• orientability of real projective space s (01/30/05)
  • Re: orientability of real projective space Todd Trimble (01/30/05)
• fundamental group of R^3 - n lines through the origin s (01/30/05)
  • Re: fundamental group of R^3 - n lines through the origin Travis Willse (01/30/05)
  • Re: fundamental group of R^3 - n lines through the origin Robin Chapman (01/30/05)
• My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/30/05)
  • Re: My claim on Omega's defn Arthur Fischer (01/30/05)
    • Re: My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: My claim on Omega's defn Arthur Fischer (01/31/05)
      • Re: My claim on Omega's defn |-|erc (01/31/05)
    • Re: My claim on Omega's defn rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/31/05)
      • Re: My claim on Omega's defn Arthur Fischer (01/31/05)
• linear MMSE estimation rambiz_at_gmail.com (01/30/05)
• Cardinality is KOOK FROTH |-|erc (01/30/05)
• Rings, Restatement of earlier problem Tony (01/30/05)
  • Re: Rings, Restatement of earlier problem William Elliot (01/30/05)
  • Re: Rings, Restatement of earlier problem Peter L. Montgomery (01/30/05)
• ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
  • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
    • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
  • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
    • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** r.e.s. (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** Torkel Franzen (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** r.e.s. (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** r.e.s. (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** r.e.s. (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** r.e.s. (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** The Ghost In The Machine (01/31/05)
      • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE CHAITIN'S OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/31/05)
  • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** fishfry (01/30/05)
    • Re: ******** CAN ANYONE HERE DEFINE OMEGA ? *********** |-|erc (01/30/05)
• Ring with two left inverses help Tony (01/30/05)
  • Re: Ring with two left inverses help Marc Olschok (01/30/05)
• Countable sets, real numbers help Tony (01/30/05)
  • Re: Countable sets, real numbers help The World Wide Wade (01/30/05)
• Help with Probability Prob Bruce (01/30/05)
  • Re: Help with Probability Prob Oscar Lanzi III (01/30/05)
    • Re: Help with Probability Prob Bruce (01/30/05)
      • Re: Help with Probability Prob Oscar Lanzi III (01/30/05)
      • Re: Help with Probability Prob Bruce (01/30/05)
  • Re: Help with Probability Prob Timothy Little (01/30/05)
• Unpublished notes by Serre? oded (01/29/05)
• Vilenken's Unstable Thin Wall of Dark Energy Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Stochastic matrices (operators?) igor.kh_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
  • Re: Stochastic matrices (operators?) Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
    • Re: Stochastic matrices (operators?) igor.kh_at_gmail.com (01/30/05)
      • Re: Stochastic matrices (operators?) Jannick Asmus (01/30/05)
      • Re: Stochastic matrices (operators?) igor.kh_at_gmail.com (01/30/05)
• US Navy Submarine C^3 & Recent Russian/Brazilian Torsion Physics Breakthroughs Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Re: real quick question...probably stupid phil (01/29/05)
• I need HELP with group algebras and finite dimensional ideals Warren065 (01/29/05)
  • Re: I need HELP with group algebras and finite dimensional ideals José Carlos Santos (01/29/05)
  • Re: I need HELP with group algebras and finite dimensional ideals Arturo Magidin (01/29/05)
• Compactness and normed spaces Donald (01/29/05)
  • Re: Compactness and normed spaces The World Wide Wade (01/29/05)
  • Re: Compactness and normed spaces Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
  • Re: Compactness and normed spaces David C. Ullrich (01/30/05)
  • Re: Proof of Keats Rosena (01/29/05)
    • Re: Proof of Keats Card XII (01/29/05)
  • Re: Proof of Keats Harry (01/29/05)
  • Re: Proof of Keats guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (01/30/05)
    • Re: Proof of Keats Saint Cad (01/30/05)
  • Re: Proof of Keats Hauke Reddmann (01/30/05)
• Surrogate factoring, out of the box jstevh_at_msn.com (01/29/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box ošin (01/29/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box David Kastrup (01/29/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box tomstdenis_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box ošin (01/29/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box ošin (01/29/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box fishfry (01/29/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box Tim Peters (01/29/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box C. Bond (01/30/05)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box mensanator_at_aol.compost (01/30/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box David Kastrup (01/30/05)
    • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box David C. Ullrich (01/30/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box David Kastrup (01/30/05)
      • Re: Surrogate factoring, out of the box Mensanator (01/30/05)
• Tough Integrals & A Strange Distribution Christian Sgraja (01/29/05)
  • Re: Tough Integrals & A Strange Distribution Karl (01/30/05)
• Re: new hunting reality series seeking competitors fishfry (01/29/05)
  • Re: new hunting reality series seeking competitors fishfry (01/29/05)
• How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
  • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Virgil (01/29/05)
    • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Virgil (01/29/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Lynn Kurtz (01/30/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Jannick Asmus (01/30/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? David C. Ullrich (01/30/05)
      • Re: How to filter all messages with capitalized titles? Bill Smythe (01/30/05)
• Zielinski's Problem and Russian Torsion WMD R&D (corrected draft) Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle David McAnally (01/29/05)
  • Re: Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle William Elliot (01/30/05)
    • Re: Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle denis feldmann (01/30/05)
    • Re: Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle David McAnally (01/30/05)
• change order of summation and integration Josh (01/29/05)
  • Re: change order of summation and integration David C. Ullrich (01/29/05)
    • Re: change order of summation and integration Josh (01/29/05)
      • Re: change order of summation and integration David C. Ullrich (01/29/05)
      • Re: change order of summation and integration Josh (01/29/05)
• Analytic Hamel Basis Felix (01/29/05)
  • Re: Analytic Hamel Basis A N Niel (01/29/05)
    • Re: Analytic Hamel Basis Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
• Fixed point of a mod equation? nobrow_at_eircom.net (01/29/05)
  • Re: Fixed point of a mod equation? Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
  • Re: Fixed point of a mod equation? Alain Verghote (01/29/05)
    • Re: Fixed point of a mod equation? Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
• Uniformly convergent sequences whose product is not William Elliot (01/29/05)
  • Re: Uniformly convergent sequences whose product is not Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
• Girth 3, diametar 2 graphs on 4k+1 and 4k+3 points Alireza (01/29/05)
• Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
  • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
    • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS r.e.s. (01/29/05)
      • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
  • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS David Bernier (01/29/05)
  • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS examachine_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
    • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS |-|erc (01/29/05)
  • Re: Herc defines the HOLY GRAIL OF MATHEMATICS David Bernier (01/29/05)
• help gravity Charles Riccardi (01/29/05)
• So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's |-|erc (01/29/05)
  • Re: So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's Keith A. Lewis (01/29/05)
    • Re: So you want APPROACHABLE oo, REAL oo, INTEGER oo, COUNTABLE oo, HIGHER oo, MEGA oo's |-|erc (01/30/05)
• Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Doug (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Nora Baron (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Math typo correction in Zielinski's problem JP (01/29/05)
• Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 The World Wide Wade (01/29/05)
  • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
  • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 George Cox (01/29/05)
    • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 Virgil (01/29/05)
    • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 David C. Ullrich (01/29/05)
      • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 George Cox (01/29/05)
      • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
      • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 David C. Ullrich (01/29/05)
  • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 Dwayne (01/29/05)
  • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 phil (01/29/05)
    • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
      • Re: Absolute value equation | x - 4 | = x/3 + 2 Rainer Rosenthal (01/29/05)
• self-similarity after all for complex webs: CUNY sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/29/05)
• Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
  • Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
  • Re: Solution of Zielinski's Problem in Einstein's GR abuse_at_mistral.net (01/29/05)
• Free help for graduate level math elliptic1_at_gmail.com (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek Cosmic Superconductor My Math Typo Correction Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• function...f mina_world (01/29/05)
  • Re: function...f Timothy Little (01/29/05)
  • Re: function...f Timothy Little (01/29/05)
    • Re: function...f mina_world (01/29/05)
• Frank Wilczek on Cosmic Superconductivity & Russian Torsion WMD Jack Sarfatti (01/29/05)
• Here are the answerds J.J.H. expected albstorz_at_gmx.de (01/28/05)
  • Re: Here are the answerds J.J.H. expected albstorz_at_gmx.de (01/29/05)
    • Re: Here are the answerds J.J.H. expected Jesse F. Hughes (01/29/05)
  • Re: Here are the answerds J.J.H. expected albstorz_at_gmx.de (01/29/05)
  • Re: Here are the answerds J.J.H. expected albstorz_at_gmx.de (01/29/05)
• Pole or removable singularity question? Tony (01/28/05)
  • Re: Pole or removable singularity question? Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
    • Re: Pole or removable singularity question? Tony (01/29/05)
      • Re: Pole or removable singularity question? Jannick Asmus (01/29/05)
• [software techniques] Which RNG should future NetHack use? Kent Paul Dolan (01/28/05)
  • Re: [software techniques] Which RNG should future NetHack use? Mok-Kong Shen (01/29/05)
    • Re: [software techniques] Which RNG should future NetHack use? Kent Paul Dolan (01/29/05)
• Lie Bracket singau (01/28/05)
• vectors Northstar (01/28/05)
  • Re: vectors Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
    • Re: vectors Northstar (01/29/05)
      • Re: vectors Randy Poe (01/29/05)
      • Re: vectors Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
      • Re: vectors Northstar (01/29/05)
• college course schedule chart maker ?? Tim923 (01/28/05)
  • Re: college course schedule chart maker ?? Kara (01/28/05)
    • Re: college course schedule chart maker ?? Tim923 (01/28/05)
  • Re: college course schedule chart maker ?? mensanator_at_aol.compost (01/29/05)
• extension of van der Waerden's theorem Paul Pollack (01/28/05)
• Re: Fermat's Proof of His Last Theorem Roman B. Binder (01/28/05)
• Re: Math society, weird behavior Lits O'Hate (01/28/05)
  • Re: Math society, weird behavior Lits O'Hate (01/28/05)
  • Re: Math society, weird behavior Lady Chatterly (01/28/05)
    • Re: Math society, weird behavior jstevh_at_msn.com (01/29/05)
      • Re: Math society, weird behavior Lady Chatterly (01/29/05)
      • Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Dr. Flonkenstein (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior fishfry (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Aratzio (01/29/05)
      • Any seconds? Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Dr. Flonkenstein (01/29/05)
      • Re: Any seconds? Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Aratzio (01/29/05)
      • Re: Any seconds? Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Gib Bogle (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Dr. Flonkenstein (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Lady Chatterly (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Kent Paul Dolan (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior David Eather (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Tim Smith (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Dr. Flonkenstein (01/29/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Clueless Newbie of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Peter J Ross (01/30/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Kook of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Dr. Flonkenstein (01/30/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Kook of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Peter J Ross (01/30/05)
      • Re: Nomination James Harris for Kook of the Month -> Re: Math society, weird behavior Dr. Flonkenstein (01/31/05)
      • Re: Math society, weird behavior David Kastrup (01/29/05)
  • Re: Math society, weird behavior Ad Hominem (01/29/05)
• (CORRECTED) Liouville theorem in dense open sets of C Patricia Romano (01/28/05)
  • Re: (CORRECTED) Liouville theorem in dense open sets of C José Carlos Santos (01/28/05)
• Re: Is LECTURE NOTES of MIT professors available on net? Munsey (01/28/05)
  • Re: Is LECTURE NOTES of MIT professors available on net? Dirk Van de moortel (01/28/05)
  • Re: Is LECTURE NOTES of MIT professors available on net? kiki (01/28/05)
• Re: V normed, B<V complete, V/B complete, then V complete. Please help! Todd Trimble (01/28/05)
• diagonable linear mappings Mario Garcia (01/28/05)
  • Re: diagonable linear mappings Jannick Asmus (01/28/05)
  • Re: diagonable linear mappings David C. Ullrich (01/28/05)
• basic combinatorics Nissim Nabar (01/28/05)
  • Re: basic combinatorics Jon Haugsand (01/28/05)
  • Re: basic combinatorics Lynn Kurtz (01/29/05)
• statistical riddle Erwin Moller (01/28/05)
  • Re: statistical riddle Jon Haugsand (01/28/05)
    • Re: statistical riddle Erwin Moller (01/28/05)
      • Re: statistical riddle Jon Haugsand (01/28/05)
      • Re: statistical riddle Jon Haugsand (01/28/05)
      • Re: statistical riddle Erwin Moller (01/28/05)
      • Re: statistical riddle Timothy Little (01/28/05)
    • Re: statistical riddle Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/28/05)
  • Re: statistical riddle tafeltennis_at_mwpenderis.mailshell.com (01/28/05)
• Groups of order 36, 40, 56 Van (01/28/05)
  • Re: Groups of order 36, 40, 56 Van (01/28/05)
    • Re: Groups of order 36, 40, 56 Van (01/29/05)
  • Re: Groups of order 36, 40, 56 Van (01/28/05)
  • Re: Groups of order 36, 40, 56 Jim Heckman (01/30/05)
• Z-module, Q-module Tony (01/28/05)
  • Re: Z-module, Q-module Robin Chapman (01/28/05)
    • Re: Z-module, Q-module Tony (01/28/05)
      • Re: Z-module, Q-module Robin Chapman (01/28/05)
      • Re: Z-module, Q-module Tony (01/28/05)
      • Re: Z-module, Q-module Robin Chapman (01/28/05)
      • Re: Z-module, Q-module David C. Ullrich (01/28/05)
      • Re: Z-module, Q-module Jannick Asmus (01/28/05)
• You guys/gals might like this userforgroups_at_hotmail.com (01/28/05)
• What is the distance traveled? qquito (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the distance traveled? hagman (01/29/05)
• What is the distrance traveled? qquito (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the distrance traveled? Michael Mendelsohn (01/28/05)
    • Re: What is the distrance traveled? Michael Mendelsohn (01/28/05)
• More about concrete categories David Libert (01/28/05)
  • Re: More about concrete categories Marc Olschok (01/28/05)
• A Class of X3SAT Solvable in PolyTime Russell Easterly (01/28/05)
  • Re: A Class of X3SAT Solvable in PolyTime Russell Easterly (01/30/05)
• are there any math results about u=f(g(u)) and u=g(f(u))? kiki (01/28/05)
  • Re: are there any math results about u=f(g(u)) and u=g(f(u))? denis feldmann (01/28/05)
  • Re: are there any math results about u=f(g(u)) and u=g(f(u))? Ulysse Keller (01/28/05)
  • Re: are there any math results about u=f(g(u)) and u=g(f(u))? M.J.T. Guy (01/28/05)
• generalizations of multiresolution approximation Pouya D. Tafti (01/28/05)
• Elementary schools run by universities Allan Adler (01/28/05)
• result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) David Bernier (01/28/05)
  • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) Robert Israel (01/28/05)
    • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) David C. Ullrich (01/28/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) G. A. Edgar (01/28/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) David C. Ullrich (01/28/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) G. A. Edgar (01/28/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) David C. Ullrich (01/29/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) G. A. Edgar (01/29/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) David C. Ullrich (01/29/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) G. A. Edgar (01/30/05)
      • Re: result of adding two brownian paths in plane (almost surely) David C. Ullrich (01/30/05)
• Splitting fields Joseph (01/28/05)
  • Re: Splitting fields rupertmccallum_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
  • Re: Splitting fields mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (01/28/05)
• sigma-algebra generated by compact sets Artur (01/27/05)
• lagrange question Nicolas Dickreuter (01/27/05)
  • Re: lagrange question Lynn Kurtz (01/28/05)
    • Re: lagrange question Nicolas Dickreuter (01/28/05)
      • Re: lagrange question The World Wide Wade (01/28/05)
  • Re: lagrange question The World Wide Wade (01/28/05)
• vector norm 2 tsmith (01/27/05)
  • Re: vector norm 2 Randy Poe (01/27/05)
    • Re: vector norm 2 tsmith (01/28/05)
      • Re: vector norm 2 Randy Poe (01/28/05)
  • Re: vector norm 2 The World Wide Wade (01/28/05)
• Cointosser joccis (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cointosser mensanator_at_aol.compost (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cointosser Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Cointosser Poly-Poly Man (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cointosser Poly-Poly Man (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cointosser Mysidia (01/28/05)
• Interesting game Midtown (01/27/05)
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 210) John Baez (01/27/05)
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 210) qmagick_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 210) Kwok Man Hui (01/30/05)
• Re: US and metric system (was Concepts of Time) Caretta (01/27/05)
• The game of Nim Wiggles (01/27/05)
  • Re: The game of Nim achava_at_hotmail.com (01/27/05)
  • Re: The game of Nim achava_at_hotmail.com (01/27/05)
• solving simultaneous integral equations Harsha (01/27/05)
  • Re: solving simultaneous integral equations Rod (01/27/05)
    • Re: solving simultaneous integral equations M.J.T. Guy (01/27/05)
  • Re: solving simultaneous integral equations Robert Israel (01/27/05)
• Adding Gaussians and finding maxima. E. Rosten (01/27/05)
  • Re: Adding Gaussians and finding maxima. phil (01/28/05)
  • Re: Adding Gaussians and finding maxima. Robert Israel (01/28/05)
    • Re: Adding Gaussians and finding maxima. E. Rosten (01/28/05)
• Tree Algorithm Rob Small (01/27/05)
• Cantor diagonal argument blues ken quirici (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues ken quirici (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues ken quirici (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues ken quirici (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues ken quirici (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Virgil (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Jesse F. Hughes (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Jesse F. Hughes (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Virgil (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
      • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/27/05)
  • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues fishfry (01/28/05)
    • Re: Cantor diagonal argument blues Timothy Little (01/28/05)
• cantor diagonal argument blues ken quirici (01/27/05)
• " Would you mind solving : f(x , y+2) =3*f(x , y) -1 ? " Alain Verghote (01/27/05)
  • Re: " Would you mind solving : f(x , y+2) =3*f(x , y) -1 ? " G. A. Edgar (01/27/05)
• lines on a pseudosphere? Ted Shoemaker (01/27/05)
  • Re: lines on a pseudosphere? Narasimham (01/27/05)
    • Re: lines on a pseudosphere? Ted Shoemaker (01/28/05)
• Simple rings and their order Warren065 (01/27/05)
  • Re: Simple rings and their order Arturo Magidin (01/27/05)
  • Re: Simple rings and their order Arturo Magidin (01/30/05)
• How far can you move the bar? The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
  • Re: How far can you move the bar? |-|erc (01/29/05)
    • Re: How far can you move the bar? The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
      • Re: How far can you move the bar? |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: How far can you move the bar? The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
• algorithm for laplace transformation / Java!? Magnus Pesch (01/27/05)
  • Re: algorithm for laplace transformation / Java!? danheyman_at_yahoo.com (01/27/05)
• Connectedness nonton (01/27/05)
  • Re: Connectedness Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Connectedness William Elliot (01/28/05)
  • Re: Connectedness William Elliot (01/27/05)
    • Re: Connectedness nonton (01/27/05)
• Re: fractional iteration of functions Alain Verghote (01/27/05)
• Banach valued functions don (01/27/05)
  • Re: Banach valued functions A N Niel (01/27/05)
• evaluation of definite integrals Harsha (01/27/05)
  • Re: evaluation of definite integrals bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/27/05)
    • Re: evaluation of definite integrals mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk (01/27/05)
      • Re: evaluation of definite integrals A N Niel (01/27/05)
  • Re: evaluation of definite integrals David C. Ullrich (01/27/05)
• put/call parity equation tsmith (01/27/05)
  • Re: put/call parity equation Axel Vogt (01/27/05)
• Re: The untestability of ESP |-|erc (01/27/05)
• Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/27/05)
  • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Alois Steindl (01/27/05)
    • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/27/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers David C. Ullrich (01/27/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/27/05)
      • Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Andreas Homrighausen (01/27/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/27/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Andreas Homrighausen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Andreas Homrighausen (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Herman Jurjus (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Bernd Funke (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers David Kastrup (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Bernd Funke (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers David Kastrup (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
      • Re: Where's respect? was Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Herman Jurjus (01/29/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Virgil (01/27/05)
    • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers denis feldmann (01/27/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/27/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers denis feldmann (01/27/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Virgil (01/27/05)
  • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers fishfry (01/27/05)
    • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/27/05)
  • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
  • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (01/27/05)
    • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Virgil (01/27/05)
    • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers Eckard Blumschein (01/28/05)
      • Re: Corrective interpretation of real numbers guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (01/28/05)
• Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? Kai (01/27/05)
  • Re: Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? William Elliot (01/27/05)
    • Re: Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? Kai (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? W. Dale Hall (01/28/05)
  • Re: Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? Travis Willse (01/27/05)
  • Re: Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? Jim Heckman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Is O(2) homeomorphic to anything? Robin Chapman (01/27/05)
• Reason for the Center of the Circle?? need4speed850_at_yahoo.com (01/27/05)
  • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Larry Hammick (01/27/05)
    • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Keith A. Lewis (01/27/05)
      • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
      • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Dave Rusin (01/27/05)
      • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
  • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
    • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Thomas Nordhaus (01/27/05)
      • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
  • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Bill Smythe (01/27/05)
    • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Bill Smythe (01/27/05)
  • Re: Reason for the Center of the Circle?? Ken Pledger (01/27/05)
• off-diagonal elements of a 3x3 inertia tensor John Henckel (01/27/05)
  • Re: off-diagonal elements of a 3x3 inertia tensor Daniel Grubb (01/28/05)
• random walk(Markov Chain) on unidirectional graph? lucy (01/27/05)
• proving continuous analog of E(X) = sum P(X>=n) steve (01/27/05)
  • Re: proving continuous analog of E(X) = sum P(X>=n) mhochster_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
  • Re: proving continuous analog of E(X) = sum P(X>=n) Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/27/05)
    • Re: proving continuous analog of E(X) = sum P(X>=n) steve (01/27/05)
      • Re: proving continuous analog of E(X) = sum P(X>=n) Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/27/05)
• Question #2 : Ordinals Tony (01/27/05)
  • Re: Question #2 : Ordinals Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
  • Re: Question #2 : Ordinals Arthur Fischer (01/27/05)
• Question #1: CP^n Tony (01/27/05)
• Question #1: CP^n Tony (01/27/05)
  • Re: Question #1: CP^n Lee Rudolph (01/27/05)
    • Re: Question #1: CP^n Tony (01/27/05)
      • Re: Question #1: CP^n W. Dale Hall (01/27/05)
• Correction on Bu Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• Need help on a group theory problem Kai (01/27/05)
  • Re: Need help on a group theory problem William Elliot (01/27/05)
    • Re: Need help on a group theory problem Kai (01/27/05)
  • Re: Need help on a group theory problem Todd Trimble (01/27/05)
• Galois theory question David (01/27/05)
  • Re: Galois theory question W. Dale Hall (01/27/05)
    • Re: Galois theory question Gerry Myerson (01/27/05)
• Algebraic int's subfield of C. Steve (01/27/05)
  • Re: Algebraic int's subfield of C. Gerry Myerson (01/27/05)
  • Re: Algebraic int's subfield of C. Travis Willse (01/27/05)
  • Re: Algebraic int's subfield of C. Steve (01/27/05)
    • Re: Algebraic int's subfield of C. Gerry Myerson (01/27/05)
  • Re: Algebraic int's subfield of C. Steve (01/27/05)
• Bohr Complementarity in General Relativity Jack Sarfatti (01/27/05)
• movie of concave convex jitterbug dick_fischbeck_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: movie of concave convex jitterbug The Last Danish Pastry (01/27/05)
    • Re: movie of concave convex jitterbug dick_fischbeck_at_yahoo.com (01/27/05)
• principal ideal domains of finite characteristic Michael Albert (01/26/05)
  • Re: principal ideal domains of finite characteristic Bill Dubuque (01/27/05)
• You'd definatly appreciate this, sci.math Poly-Poly Man (01/26/05)
  • Re: You'd definatly appreciate this, sci.math denis feldmann (01/27/05)
• sigma-algebra generated by compact sets Artur (01/26/05)
  • Re: sigma-algebra generated by compact sets Nathan (01/28/05)
    • Re: sigma-algebra generated by compact sets Artur (01/28/05)
• finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger aasiyah (01/26/05)
  • Re: finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger pi (01/26/05)
  • Re: finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger Lynn Kurtz (01/27/05)
  • Re: finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger Keith A. Lewis (01/27/05)
    • Re: finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger Robert Israel (01/27/05)
      • Re: finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger Dave Seaman (01/27/05)
      • Re: finding the reason for why the integral gets bigger Keith A. Lewis (01/27/05)
• Smallest Primitive Roots Harry J. Smith (01/26/05)
  • Re: Smallest Primitive Roots Gerry Myerson (01/26/05)
    • Re: Smallest Primitive Roots Harry J. Smith (01/27/05)
• Constant density. Nora Baron (01/26/05)
  • Re: Constant density. The World Wide Wade (01/26/05)
• Mathforge.net :: Green-Tao, the Wagner Conjecture, Larry Summers and Christianity jkauzlar_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
• Set of diophantine numbers Artur (01/26/05)
  • Re: Set of diophantine numbers Artur (01/26/05)
• Simple rings and their order Warren065 (01/26/05)
  • Re: Simple rings and their order Arturo Magidin (01/26/05)
• tricky problem defining function Col Brown (01/26/05)
• Help!! Lower bound of eigenvalues of strictly positve definite matrix?? stan (01/26/05)
  • Re: Help!! Lower bound of eigenvalues of strictly positve definite matrix?? Zdislav V. Kovarik (01/26/05)
    • Re: Help!! Lower bound of eigenvalues of strictly positve definite matrix?? stan (01/26/05)
      • Re: Help!! Lower bound of eigenvalues of strictly positve definite matrix?? Zdislav V. Kovarik (01/28/05)
• must numbers in maths be unitless Johnny (01/26/05)
  • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless Ron Sperber (01/26/05)
  • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/26/05)
    • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/26/05)
  • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless steve_wildstrom_at_businessweek.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless A N Niel (01/26/05)
  • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless Bill Smythe (01/26/05)
  • Re: must numbers in maths be unitless Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (01/27/05)
• lim x->[value] - ever require uncountable infinity of (imagined) test cases? ken quirici (01/26/05)
  • Re: lim x->[value] - ever require uncountable infinity of (imagined) test cases? Dave Seaman (01/26/05)
    • Re: lim x->[value] - ever require uncountable infinity of (imagined) test cases? ken quirici (01/26/05)
• very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions Alex Hunsley (01/26/05)
  • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions José Carlos Santos (01/26/05)
    • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions Alex Hunsley (01/26/05)
    • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions Alex Hunsley (01/26/05)
      • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions William Elliot (01/27/05)
  • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions Marc Olschok (01/26/05)
    • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions Alex Hunsley (01/26/05)
  • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions phil (01/26/05)
    • Re: very simple: intersection of zeroes of two functions Alex Hunsley (01/26/05)
• " x |(x^2+5x+2)*(2-3x) = 2x * (x^2 +4 ) , a direct computing! " Alain Verghote (01/26/05)
• The Concept of Speed in Mathematics Patrick Bangert (01/26/05)
  • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics phil (01/26/05)
  • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics George Cox (01/26/05)
    • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics Hero (01/26/05)
    • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics W. Dale Hall (01/26/05)
  • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics Ken Pledger (01/26/05)
  • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics r.e.s. (01/26/05)
  • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics matt271829-news_at_yahoo.co.uk (01/26/05)
    • Re: The Concept of Speed in Mathematics r.e.s. (01/27/05)
• How does f relate to g Narasimham (01/26/05)
  • Re: How does f relate to g Peter Webb (01/26/05)
  • Re: How does f relate to g A N Niel (01/26/05)
  • Re: How does f relate to g Keith A. Lewis (01/26/05)
• financial math: risk neutral valuation question Nicolas Dickreuter (01/26/05)
  • Re: financial math: risk neutral valuation question Įlvaro Begué (01/26/05)
• whats the answer to this YOU DIDN'T STATE IT RIGHT |-|erc (01/26/05)
• OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies googleposter226_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies |-|erc (01/26/05)
    • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies Rushtown (01/26/05)
      • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies Ogie Ogelthorpe (01/27/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies Arthur Fischer (01/26/05)
    • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies valdez (01/26/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
    • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
  • Re: OK say when, no chicken sh*t replies korax1214_at_mailandnews.co.uk (01/27/05)
• Markov Chain stationarity? Bill Taylor (01/26/05)
• Normal distribution question? Sonja Elen Kisa (01/26/05)
  • Re: Normal distribution question? Philip Holman (01/26/05)
    • Re: Normal distribution question? Sonja Elen Kisa (01/26/05)
      • Re: Normal distribution question? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: Normal distribution question? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: Normal distribution question? Sonja Elen Kisa (01/26/05)
      • Re: Normal distribution question? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Normal distribution question? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: Normal distribution question? Jim Ferry (01/26/05)
    • Re: Normal distribution question? Sonja Elen Kisa (01/27/05)
• need to construct some stationary processes? Bill Taylor (01/26/05)
• Proof that the product of two positive reals is positive? Philip Barlowe (01/26/05)
  • Re: Proof that the product of two positive reals is positive? Stephen J. Herschkorn (01/26/05)
• under what condition does Markov Chain constitute a stationary process? Bill Taylor (01/26/05)
• C(n, k): binomial coefficient calculation Yuzuru Hiraga (01/26/05)
  • Re: C(n, k): binomial coefficient calculation Chris McMahon (01/27/05)
  • Re: C(n, k): binomial coefficient calculation Yuzuru Hiraga (01/28/05)
• what is a good Markov Chain model for this pattern? Bill Taylor (01/26/05)
• hermite interpolation tejasm_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: hermite interpolation tsmith (01/26/05)
• step by step info resolve equation os2 (01/26/05)
  • Re: step by step info resolve equation William Elliot (01/26/05)
• step by step info resolve equation os2 (01/26/05)
  • Re: step by step info resolve equation Michael Jųrgensen (01/26/05)
• resolve equation... step by step... os2 (01/26/05)
  • Re: resolve equation... step by step... William Elliot (01/26/05)
    • Re: resolve equation... step by step... Alex Hunsley (01/26/05)
• Cardinality is like psychology |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: Cardinality is like psychology valdez (01/26/05)
    • Re: Cardinality is like psychology |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: Cardinality is like psychology valdez (01/26/05)
  • Re: Cardinality is like psychology fishfry (01/26/05)
• YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? valdez (01/26/05)
    • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? valdez (01/26/05)
  • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
    • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? Will Twentyman (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: YOU IGNORAMUSES ACTUAL:LY BELIEVE THIS ? The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
• Reality check, surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring ošin (01/26/05)
  • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring bobbysim_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Larry Hammick (01/26/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring David Kastrup (01/26/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring mensanator_at_aol.compost (01/26/05)
  • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Tim Smith (01/26/05)
    • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring jstevh_at_msn.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring bryant_j_j_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring ošin (01/26/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Tim Smith (01/27/05)
    • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Rick Decker (01/27/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Mack (01/28/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Rick Decker (01/28/05)
  • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Jesse F. Hughes (01/26/05)
    • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring ošin (01/26/05)
  • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Matt Grime (01/26/05)
    • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Jesse F. Hughes (01/26/05)
      • Re: Reality check, surrogate factoring Matt Grime (01/26/05)
• Markov Chain stationarity? kiki (01/26/05)
  • Re: Markov Chain stationarity? kiki (01/26/05)
  • Re: Markov Chain stationarity? Robert Israel (01/26/05)
• vector norm tsmith (01/26/05)
  • Re: vector norm Robert Israel (01/26/05)
    • Re: vector norm William Elliot (01/26/05)
• Implication of Dirichlet Condition SYL (01/26/05)
  • Re: Implication of Dirichlet Condition The World Wide Wade (01/26/05)
    • Re: Implication of Dirichlet Condition The World Wide Wade (01/26/05)
  • Re: Implication of Dirichlet Condition Travis Willse (01/26/05)
    • Re: Implication of Dirichlet Condition The World Wide Wade (01/26/05)
• THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > bobbysim_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > valdez (01/26/05)
    • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > George Cox (01/26/05)
• THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > ( THAT ARE < 10 ) |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > ( THAT ARE < 10 ) valdez (01/26/05)
    • Re: THERE ARE oo DIGITS IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1.. > ( THAT ARE < 10 ) The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
• HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
    • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
  • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo Will Twentyman (01/26/05)
    • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo Will Twentyman (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo Will Twentyman (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo Will Twentyman (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/29/05)
  • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo George Cox (01/26/05)
    • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo valdez (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo George Cox (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/26/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/27/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo |-|erc (01/29/05)
      • Re: HOW MANY DIGITS ARE IN < 0 . 1 2 1 2 1 .. > ( THAT ARE LESS THAN 10 ) ? oo The Ghost In The Machine (01/29/05)
• JSH: Pathetic, but world is still here jstevh_at_msn.com (01/25/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pathetic, but world is still here guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de (01/26/05)
  • Re: Pathetic, but world is still here ošin (01/26/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pathetic, but world is still here C. Bond (01/26/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pathetic, but world is still here litsohate_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
  • Re: JSH: Pathetic, but world is still here Wayne Brown (01/26/05)
• Two stupid, easy problems Poly-Poly Man (01/25/05)
  • Re: Two stupid, easy problems Arturo Magidin (01/26/05)
    • Re: Two stupid, easy problems Thomas Nordhaus (01/26/05)
    • Re: Two stupid, easy problems William Elliot (01/26/05)
  • Re: Two stupid, easy problems Oscar Lanzi III (01/26/05)
  • Re: Two stupid, easy problems Oscar Lanzi III (01/26/05)
  • Re: Two stupid, easy problems Bill Smythe (01/26/05)
  • Riddle Bill Smythe (01/26/05)
    • Re: Riddle Virgil (01/26/05)
    • Re: Riddle Bill Smythe (01/26/05)
      • Re: Riddle Poly-Poly Man (01/26/05)
    • Re: Riddle lvirden_at_gmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: Riddle Ken Pledger (01/26/05)
• Some simple math questions Al Lal (01/25/05)
  • Re: Some simple math questions Jon Haugsand (01/26/05)
• need to construct some stationary processes? lucy (01/25/05)
  • Re: need to construct some stationary processes? beliavsky_at_aol.com (01/25/05)
    • Re: need to construct some stationary processes? <