Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?
From: Julien Santini (santini.julien_at_wanadoo.fr)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .9999... = 1 proof"
- Previous message: Richard Henry: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- In reply to: Richard Henry: "Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:28:09 +0100
> > Theoratically, if they generate random numbers using computer pseudo
> random
> > number, there should be patterns that are traceable...
You're right, and there was such a case a few years ago for a bingo-type
game. A few experts had been able to reproduce the algorithm involved in the
generation of the numbers (or, maybe, had stolen the formula, which is much
more likely since it must not be possible to work on so little data).
Anyways, they changed the way to proceed and instead of using a numerical
algorithm, they now analyze the waves in the ambiant air to determine their
numbers -which criterias are really involved I couldn't tell, I'm a physics
dummy-.
-- Julien Santini
- Next message: S. Enterprize Company: "Re: .9999... = 1 proof"
- Previous message: Richard Henry: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- In reply to: Richard Henry: "Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|