Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition
From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: Lexicons"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Style over substance"
- In reply to: Gactimus: "Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:09:44 GMT
Gactimus wrote:
> Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in news:41D4B6EA.3000407@nospam.com:
>
>
>>The numbers say it all.
>
>
> Bush's inauguration is almost entirely funded by private money.
Yeah- that 40M just applies to the special interests buying access. The
government share is almost certainly over 100M with all the security
arrangements that have been in the works for a few months now. It looks
like most nations have to mobilize their entire armed services to
protect the idiot anywhere he goes to.
- Next message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: Lexicons"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: JSH: Style over substance"
- In reply to: Gactimus: "Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|