Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time.

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 01/01/05 

Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:26:59 GMT

"Lefty" <Ye@h.Right> wrote in message news:%%rBd.2136$3m6.2075@attbi_s51...
> An example of division by zero in nature. Also, a justification of a
> multidimensional space, possible of non-integral dimension. The
> decomposition of time, and an approach to the fabric of spacetime.
>
> It's full of words, but they're all very simple, and the only math
> required is division.
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Our understanding of time, and our ability to measure it is based on
cycles
> in nature.
>
> You can build a clock out of the solar system, and maybe even some larger
> things. But at some point, things become so vast that their gross motion
is
> zero or very near zero, relative to man. In other words, the universe is
> vast and nearly motionless relative to man.
>
> Earth spins on axis ~365.25 times per every revolution round the Sun.
> Basically, a 1 : 365 ratio.
>
> Moon goes round Earth 12 times per year. Essentially a 12 : 1 ratio.
>
> Now, lets see you build a clock out of the whole universe! There is a
> problem. It is so huge, that even if it has some gross, collective motion
> such as rotation, it is just so vast that we simply cannot observe such
> motions. They cant be measured with any instrument, and even if you could,
> they would be either zero or very near zero relative to everything else in
> the universe.
>
> So, you have a ratio which is basically 1 : 0 or something like that, and
> the universe simply cannot divide by zero. So, the only reasonable
> conclusion, and it's really very simple, is that 4 dimensional spacetime
> decomposes into 3 dimensional space as time becomes unobservable (relative
> to an observer).
>
> You cannot build a clock out of the the whole universe because the large
> scale motions are so close to zero, relative to us. Time is therefore
> unmeasurable, and unobservable, relative to us. And, if it is
unmeasurable,
> and unobservable, then time ceases to exist on that scale, relative to us.

>
> The same must also be true of the quantum world. Things can become so
small
> that they simply do not exist relative to an observer such as us.
>
> It seems that we are trapped between two worlds, the extremely large, and
> the extremely small. We are somewhere in the middle. Additionally, it
seems
> that the fabric of 4D spacetime decomposes into a 3 dimensional state,
> possibly decomposing into a state which is nonexistent relative to an
> observer.
>
> -WK-
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> Comments, criticism & outrage - please post.

Yea - use your ideas to make a non trivial prediction that can be tested
against current theories. If you can' t do that then guess what - it is -
well to be blunt - ****ing; not science.

Bill

Relevant Pages