Re: Division by Zero in Nature,
mensanator_at_aol.compost
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: JSH: Brainstorming"
- Previous message: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- In reply to: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Next in thread: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Reply: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Jan 2005 10:05:41 -0800
Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen wrote:
> I wouldn't go that far to find division by zero in nature.
> if you mix water with milk in certain amounts,
> You will see a phenomena called "Anomalous dispersion".
> The imaginary part of the refraction index is dvided by zero.
> If we measure it, it becomes large but doesn't go to infinity.
Doesn't that imply that your calculation is wrong?
> The imaginairy part of n is a measure for absorption of
EM-radiation.(light)
> Geert-Jan
- Next message: Tim Peters: "Re: JSH: Brainstorming"
- Previous message: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- In reply to: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Next in thread: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Reply: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|