Re: Division by Zero in Nature,
From: Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen (g.a.uytdewilligen_at_zonnet.nl)
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: George Cox: "Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?"
- Previous message: Narasimham: "Re: Would someone be so kind as to help me with a math equation?"
- In reply to: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Next in thread: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Reply: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:47:00 GMT
It really isn't my calculation, it's Physics' theory.
But no infinite values are measured. As you know,
infinite is not a number.
Geert-Jan
<mensanator@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1104602741.484953.95200@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen wrote:
> > I wouldn't go that far to find division by zero in nature.
> > if you mix water with milk in certain amounts,
> > You will see a phenomena called "Anomalous dispersion".
> > The imaginary part of the refraction index is dvided by zero.
> > If we measure it, it becomes large but doesn't go to infinity.
>
> Doesn't that imply that your calculation is wrong?
>
> > The imaginairy part of n is a measure for absorption of
> EM-radiation.(light)
> > Geert-Jan
>
- Next message: George Cox: "Re: about lottery... any successful stories on predicting lotteries?"
- Previous message: Narasimham: "Re: Would someone be so kind as to help me with a math equation?"
- In reply to: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Next in thread: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Reply: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature,"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|