Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/06/05
- Next message: Anders Gjendemsjø: "Closed form expression of this?"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: Stone Topology: Metrizable?"
- In reply to: Timothy Little: "Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable"
- Next in thread: Timothy Little: "Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable"
- Reply: Timothy Little: "Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:59:59 +1000
"Timothy Little" <tim-via-n.i.net@little-possums.net> wrote in
> |-|erc wrote:
> > what is the opposite of "some finite coin sequences are not computable",
>
> The opposite is "all finite coin sequences are computable". That's
> not the same thing as "all infinite coin sequences are computable".
>
>
> - Tim
Answer the poll 1st please.... then explain the difference.
Herc
--
what do women say about male sperm? sex cells never age? protein rich?
:-C==8 You'll never never know if you never never blow! :-C==8
- Next message: Anders Gjendemsjø: "Closed form expression of this?"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: Stone Topology: Metrizable?"
- In reply to: Timothy Little: "Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable"
- Next in thread: Timothy Little: "Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable"
- Reply: Timothy Little: "Re: POLL: Some finite coin sequences are not computable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
