Re: Euclidean division
From: Ken Pledger (Ken.Pledger_at_mcs.vuw.ac.nz)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Matt Gutting: "Re: Cantor K.O.'d -- again! - Further explication"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: sci.math logic"
- In reply to: Larry Hammick: "Euclidean division"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:05:01 +1300
In article <xU0Dd.52004$dv1.30653@edtnps89>,
"Larry Hammick" <larryhammick@OMIT-MEtelus.net> wrote:
> Lately there have been a couple of threads about the Euclidean division
> algorithm in Z[i] and in Z[u] where uu+u+1=0. It might be worth mentioning
> that there is a variation of that algo which uses no division, but only
> subtraction.
> In Z to start with, say f_0 and f_1 are not both zero, and define
> inductively
> f_(n+2) = | f_n - f_(n+1) |....
FWIW that's exactly the original Greek way of doing it: Euclid
VII.1 and VII.2.
Ken Pledger.
- Next message: Matt Gutting: "Re: Cantor K.O.'d -- again! - Further explication"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: sci.math logic"
- In reply to: Larry Hammick: "Euclidean division"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]