Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Andy Watkins: "Re: Cantor K.O.'d -- again!"
- Previous message: Ron Sperber: "Re: Stuck :("
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 6 Jan 2005 19:05:16 -0800
robert j. kolker says...
>Daryl McCullough wrote:
>> To say that an infinite coin sequence cs is computable to infinite
>> length is to say that there is a single computable function f that
>> can compute all the places in cs. The negation is this:
>>
>> Every computable function f computes only finitely many places in cs.
>
>What about alternating heads/tails forever. That is a trivial function
>which computers all the places. Odd places have heads, even places have
>tails.
Yeah. What I meant was that for every function f, there is a maximum
natural m such that f correctly computes places 0 through m.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Andy Watkins: "Re: Cantor K.O.'d -- again!"
- Previous message: Ron Sperber: "Re: Stuck :("
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]