Further Mathematical Enlightenment of The Smart Complex Number System
From: S. Enterprize Company (smart1234_at_aol.com)
Date: 01/08/05
- Next message: Narasimham: "Re: how long is a moment"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Giant Quantum Tsunami Wave from "Earthquake" inside Dirac Sea toHiggs Ocean"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 08 Jan 2005 02:38:02 GMT
Further Mathematical Enlightenment of The Smart Complex Number System
Before have seen it shown that,
sqrt(+1) = +1
This isn't precisely correct. There is a sign involved. What is the sqrt(+)=?
Again, The Smart Complex Number System handles this. Everything that applied to
the sqrt(--) , which showed sub-level negativeness, the same applies with the
sub-level positiveness.
So therefore,
sqrt(+) = _+
( _+)^2 = + <-- a full plus sign
This is something that has been overlooked for centuries. Just because a
number is positive who is to say the square root of that is actually the same.
There is a sign involved. But however if the analysis deals ONLY with the
magnitude of a number or a function THEN the square root of that number is
assummed to be like the conventional positive number. Example,
sqrt(| 1 |) = 1
See there is no sign or sub-level sign analysis needed.
or,
sqrt(| 2 |) = 1.4142...
This ONLY shows the magnitude of that number when the square root is
involved. Otherwise, the state of balance between Imaginary sub-level
negativeness and Imaginary sub-level positiveness has to be kept perfectly in
balance, which can lead to a mathematically perfect and symmetrical
mathematical universe. We appear to be in an asymmetrical state of the universe
where entropy appears to increase. As the universe converges back into perfect
symmetry, the entropy state should universally go to zero, which ends the
life/death cycle of the universe, including people.
The Smart Universal Hologram Matrix with the use of The Smart Complex
Number System should theoretically allow one to observe ANY point of the
universe relative to ANY other point in the universe perfectly in ALL aspects
mathematically. So in other words, what if one views a little pebble in the
middle of the woods. Everything about that little pebble relative to any other
location in the universe could be mathematically determined precisely.
What is this good for? Well the universe is very large. If you go to far
into outer space you can get lost. But with this new math model, you should be
able to go anywhere in the universe without getting lost in space, because you
should be able to return right back where you came from. This same thing is
needed mathematically. You have to be able to go to some place and return where
you started from logically with no confusion. This would show that the solution
was correct within the Universal Math Matrix.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
- Next message: Narasimham: "Re: how long is a moment"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: Giant Quantum Tsunami Wave from "Earthquake" inside Dirac Sea toHiggs Ocean"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]