Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?
From: Timothy Little (tim-via-n.i.net_at_little-possums.net)
Date: 01/08/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: countability of reals"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Jan 2005 03:51:50 GMT
|-|erc wrote:
> can you rephrase your proposition into the above form?
You mean a sloppy and ambiguous form. The answer is no, not in a way
that maintains logical equivalence.
>> Define a sequence <a_n> by a_n = P_n(n) + 1.
>
> For the sequence to be possible it must be emulatable by some
> function Q.
That's an assertion without proof. Prove it.
- Tim
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: countability of reals"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]