basic linear algebra determinant proof
From: tsmith (tsmith76_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:04:58 -0800
This is in the context of numerical analysis, and the Gaussian Elimination
with backward substitution algorithm.
The proof seems very easy, and so I am wondering if maybe I skipped some
steps that I shouldn't have, or maybe this is just a freebie :)
If a nonzero pivot element cannot be found at any stage, then the matrix is
singular.
Proof:
Let A be a matrix where a nonzero pivot cannot be found at some stage.
Write A in upper triangular form by applying row operations. Since a
nonzero pivot could not be found at some stage, there is a zero element on
the main diagonal of the matrix. Then, because the determinant of a matrix
in upper triangular form is the product of the elements on its diagonal, the
determinant is zero. And thus by the "Determinant Criterion for
Invertibility" Theorem, the matrix is singular.
Aside, could I also argue as follows? Write A in row echelon form. Since a
nonzero pivot could not be found at some stage, there exists a row with all
zero elements, and thus A is singular.
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Previous message: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]