Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?
From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: keith: "Re: We are going to need to say this over and over again: "Bush stole it!""
- Previous message: tsmith: "basic linear algebra determinant proof"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:06:27 +1000
> >
> > define a TM
> > prove it is impossible
> > define a number using impossible TM
>
> The TM for computing Chaitin's Constant is a mutation of
> the TM for computing the halting problem.
>
> [spitsnip]
>
so you prove the halting value of some programs is unknown
then you assign that to a variable, an unknown so to speak?
X = of Halt(777)
an unknown of the unknown. <gag>
Y = "there is a god"
what is the value of Y?
Herc
- Next message: keith: "Re: We are going to need to say this over and over again: "Bush stole it!""
- Previous message: tsmith: "basic linear algebra determinant proof"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: OPPOSITE OF all coin sequences are computable to infinite length ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|