Re: abundance of irrationals

From: Dave Seaman (dseaman_at_no.such.host)
Date: 01/09/05


Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC)

On 9 Jan 2005 06:11:23 -0800, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> Keith A. Lewis wrote:

>> I can set up a process to go through the natural numbers. It is true
> that
>> this process will never finish, but if you choose any particular
> natural
>> number I can tell you when it will be visited.

> If you believe, that this completes infinity (leading to aleph_0
> natural numbers) then you should admit that the same is true for the
> following construction of all reals, leading to aleph_0 binary digits
> (and more are not possible, even for transcendental numbers:

> 0.1
> 0.01, 0.11
> 0.001, 0.101, 0.011, 0.111
> ...

> Always insert 0 or 1 behind the point of each number given in the last
> line. You'll get them all.

At which position in this list does the rational number 1/3 appear?

-- 
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Basic set question
    ... >> Dave Seaman ... >> Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. ... > Calling a list a set does not make it one. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Transcendental Dimensions
    ... Dave Seaman ... Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: 0^0
    ... Dave Seaman ... Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: (sketch of a) Proof that the set of Real Numbers doesnt exist
    ... What about the algebraic irrationals? ... Dave Seaman ... Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor
    ... > proved using the induction theorem. ... Dave Seaman ... Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. ...
    (sci.math)