Re: DARK DAY MONDAY..........

From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/10/05 

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:40:39 +1000

"Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in ...
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
>
> > "Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in ...
> >> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
> >>
> >> Let's try this: Consider the prediction "silent Tuesday", which I offer
> >> today. What does and does not satisfy that prediction?
> >>
> >> What weeks can it happen?
> >>
> >> What day of the week can it happen?
> >>
> >> What can the event be?
> >>
> >> If you don't know the exact answer to any of those, give the tightest
> >> constraints you can.
>
> [...]
>
> > Using the procedure of working back from the catastrophe to the closest hit, you
> > will always score for someone.
>
> And therein lies the problem.
>

So you admit you don't consider ANY prediction no matter how accurate and detailed
and precise? That would be the actual problem, no use convincing you further to the maximum
extent you can be convinced that a prediction was accurate, 0.

Herc

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DARK DAY MONDAY..........
    ... >> And therein lies the problem. ... > So you admit you don't consider ANY prediction no matter how accurate and detailed ... > extent you can be convinced that a prediction was accurate, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: AC Regionals
    ... I've heard the convincing arguments.. ... Florida - 4th place. ... my mistake guys ...
    (rec.sport.disc)