Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?
mueckenh_at_rz.fh-augsburg.de
Date: 01/10/05
- Next message: Artur: "Re: continuity in Baire spaces"
- Previous message: S. Enterprize Company: "Smart Model "Fine Structure Constant alpha_sm""
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Jan 2005 06:10:33 -0800
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> In <1105205430.608164.205210@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, on
> 01/08/2005
> at 09:30 AM, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de said:
>
> >Would you believe that all 35^10^10 texts with 10^10 letters, which
> >are possible in principle, do exist?
>
> No, because the alphabet that I use only has 26 letters[1], plus not
> all strings qualify as texts in English. I do, however, believe that
a
> somewhat smaller set of possible texts exists.
What is "possible existence"? Can anybody read them or not? Of course,
many different numbers do possibly exist. But simultaneous use can be
made of less than 2^10^100 only. And no string with more than 2^10^100
digits can ever be set up, in a mind, in a computer or elsewhere.
>
> I'm currently upstairs. Do you believe that the books I have
> downstairs exist? I;m not observing them.
I would believe it, if you say so, because I have no reason to distrust
you in this respect. But it cannot be excluded, that you books
meanwhile are elsewhere or nowhere.
>
> >being available to be compared, analysed, investigated?
>
> What does being available have to do with anything. The hope diamond
> isn't available to me; does that mean that it doesn't exist?
The diamond's existence has material roots. A number has nothing to
prove existence, except someone knows it.Like a novel which has not yet
been written.
>
> [1] Allowing for punctuation still doesn't get you to 35^10^10.
Include brackets, curly brackets (perhaps the book is on set theory,
numbers, and you will need more than 35. My keyboard has more than 40
keys.
I know, that my position is not easy to swallow.
Regards, WM
- Next message: Artur: "Re: continuity in Baire spaces"
- Previous message: S. Enterprize Company: "Smart Model "Fine Structure Constant alpha_sm""
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Next in thread: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|