Well-ordered series of ordinals
From: Noel Vaillant (vaillant_at_probability.net)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Partition strangeness"
- Next in thread: Dave Seaman: "Re: Well-ordered series of ordinals"
- Reply: Dave Seaman: "Re: Well-ordered series of ordinals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Jan 2005 04:04:09 -0800
Given a family (ai) of ordinals indexed by a well-ordered set I.
Define the sum sum_i ai as the unique ordinal isomorphic to the
well-ordered set:
X = \/_{i in I} {i} x ai
where the good order on X is given by:
[(i,x) <= (j,y)] <-> [ (i<j) \/ ((i=j)/\(x <= y)) ]
I would like someone to confirm that provided I is isomorphic
to a limit ordinal, we have the equality:
sum_i ai = sup_{J<I} sum_{i in J} ai
where J<I indicates that J is a strict initial segment of I.
-- Noel.
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Partition strangeness"
- Next in thread: Dave Seaman: "Re: Well-ordered series of ordinals"
- Reply: Dave Seaman: "Re: Well-ordered series of ordinals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|