Re: Definition of
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 01/10/05
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: There are uncountably many irrationals was Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: Hagen: "Re: Definition of"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:14:35 -0500
In <200501100649.j0A6n2n19509@proapp.mathforum.org>, on 01/10/2005
at 07:32 AM, knaf@itwm.fhg.de (Hagen) said:
>As far as I know the notion of a >meromorphic function<
>exists since a long time.
Certainly more than the dozens of years that Rand Yates mentions.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: There are uncountably many irrationals was Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Cantor's diagonal proof wrong?"
- In reply to: Hagen: "Re: Definition of"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
