Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST

From: Termite of Tempation (bokkibear_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 01/11/05 

Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:50:32 GMT

"SurfedIn" <soldout2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:200501110957.j0B9vSo03926@proapp.mathforum.org...
> On 11 Jan 2005, |-|erc wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Neither follows from my answer, which involves all finite prefixes
only.
> >> While all digits do appear (given any digit, it has a finite index),
> >> the number does not.
> >>
> >> It's the same problem as your favorite sequence
> >>
> >> <.3>
> >> <.33>
> >> <.333>
> >> <.3333>
> >> <.33333>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> which has all digits of 1/3. Does it contain 1/3? No.
> >>
> >> Your logic does not work.
> >>
> >
> >
> >*** YOU ARE STUPID.
> >
> >
> >
> >you say ALL THE DIGITS OF PI APPEAR IN THE LIST.
> >
> >THEN YOU SAY
> >
> >only a finite number of them do.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >YOU CANT COMPREHEND WHAT I AM DEMOING
> >
> >SO JUST IGNORE ALL MY POSTS
> >
> >SEE IF SOMEONE ELSE CAN ACTUALLY REASON.
> >
> >
> >
> >Anyone else comment on those 2 statements.

Sure. It seems you have two problems :
1) You refuse to use enough rigour to ask the questions in any
comprehensible way, and thus the answers cannot be simple.
2) The only way to fully answer your question is to say that

"For any positive integer n, the first n digits of pi is a computable
sequence."

does NOT imply that

"The sequence consisting of all the digits of pi is a computable sequence."

Duncan

Quantcast