Re: HOW MANY DIGITS OF PI HAVE PROPERTY X ?

From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/12/05 

Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:30:32 +1000

"Will Twentyman" <wtwentyman@read.my.sig> wrote in
> |-|erc wrote:
>
> > Pi = <314159.....................................................................................>
> > |<------how many digits---------->|
> >
> >
> > Let property X = the digit, and every preceding digit up to that digit occur in order in the right spot on
> > (a member of) list Y
> >
> > Let Y = {
> > <333333333..>
> > <300000000..>
> > <399999999..>
> > <314314314..>
> > ..
> > }
> > Y has infinite members.
> > The above is just a sample.
> > Y is computed by UTM(row, col) mod 10
> > Y includes all computable numbers for some numeric representation
> >
> >
> > The answer should be a quantity
> > |<------how many digits---------->|
> >
> > that is not related, dependant, or refers to Y.
>
> The answer should be a quantity only if you allow infinity as a quantity.

You're the one who thinks oo e R

there is no problems with infinity being a quantity. LOOK HOW BIG THE UNIVERSE IS!

the number of digits = oo

fine answer to me!

oo is a measure of quantity, an actual reference to the amount of digits in question,

as compared to 10 people who answered, "any finite amount referenced in the target lists elements"

>
> > Example :
> > Pi = <314159.....................................................................................>
> > |<------how many digits---------->|
> >
> > Let Y = {
> > <31400000..>
> > <31411111..>
> > <31322222..>
> > <31433333..>
> > }
> >
> > Answer : 3
> >
>

The key to practicing mathematics is to answer the question in the form it was asked.

How many X of Y have Z?

This should always be a quantity. If you think the solution is "for every digit, considering this,
dependeing on that..." that's not the solution, your response answer though correct is not reduced.

Herc

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relative Cardinality
    ... No problem with potential infinity. ... > Knowing all the digits of the real numbers can be done with arithmetic ... > particles, in the same order you've established. ... > not have said that your "cardinality" is the same as traditional ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantors diagonal proof wrong?
    ... Infinity is not an integer, ... just a string of digits, ... >possible to prove anything by contradiction. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Relative Cardinality
    ... Which infinity is a number according to Cantor? ... >> particles, in the same order you've established. ... But it is sufficient to encode the information: All digits ... >> cardinality, unless you can show that, for any set S, the cardinality ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Relative Cardinality
    ... > No problem with potential infinity. ... How do you express "potential infinity" in the universe? ... >> particles, in the same order you've established. ... But it is sufficient to encode the information: All digits ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantors diagonal proof wrong?
    ... > infinity, you are making some basic assumptions on what an idea is. ... > of the size of an infinite set is a contradiction in itself). ... > So you just reverse the digits in the integer to create the real. ... > this mapping is one to one and covers all the reals in that range. ...
    (sci.math)