Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: mueckenh_at_rz.fh-augsburg.de: "Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Previous message: adamgolding_at_adamgolding.com: "usenet, math, and tablet PCs?"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:19:20 -0600
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:32:45 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
>> >Results 1 - 10 of about 580 for david ullrich fool.
>> >
>
>this makes *me* look ridiculous?
Yes, if one looks at those 10 hits and considers what
you were trying to demonstrate by posting them.
>You're the one saying HE'S RIGHT YOU'RE WRONG
>then trying to look smart still posting on the same thread.
>
>What happened to the unwritten rules of sci.math that you wrote David?
Um. Never mind.
>If your statements get challenged then you
>1/ support them
>2/ admit error
>3/ go away
Right. Now where's your support for your statement that I
once said that irrationals are perfect?
>Herc
>
>
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: mueckenh_at_rz.fh-augsburg.de: "Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Previous message: adamgolding_at_adamgolding.com: "usenet, math, and tablet PCs?"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
