Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology"
From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: c_at_5hut.net: "inverse of continuous function"
- Previous message: Fijoy George: "Re: Analytic Interpolation"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Next in thread: Timothy Murphy: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: Timothy Murphy: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:47:54 +0100
examachine@gmail.com writes:
> I disagree that applied mathematics is rather trivial. All computer
> science can be seen as applied mathematics, for instance. Are
> algorithms trivial things?
This is simply not true. Much computer science is closer to pure
mathematics than to applied mathematics.
-- Jesse F. Hughes "Radicals are interesting because they were considered 'radical' by the people who played with them who wrote a lot of math work that modern mathematics depends on." --Another JSH history lesson
- Next message: c_at_5hut.net: "inverse of continuous function"
- Previous message: Fijoy George: "Re: Analytic Interpolation"
- In reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Next in thread: Timothy Murphy: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: Timothy Murphy: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|