Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST
From: Will Twentyman (wtwentyman_at_read.my.sig)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: clueless about permutations"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:35:42 -0500
|-|erc wrote:
>>>No, I'm trying to get someone to say that a coin sequence, *every flip* appears in order
>>>in a random binary list.
>>
>>You aren't likely to get that statement from us, it's too ambiguous.
>
> you're not included anyway, you're a lttle runt head trashing every thread then
> ignoring it.
Ah, well in that case, a gentle reminder that you aren't interested in
my comments will suffice, should I comment on one of your threads again.
BTW, the offer still stands to go through the meaning of primitive
recursive and recursive functions to attempt to show you why there is no
halt function.
> the proposition is true, that is why you FAIL to answer the questions directly.
Are we doing probability or logic?
-- Will Twentyman email: wtwentyman at copper dot net
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: just 5 quick answers then I can summarise and GO"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: clueless about permutations"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: ANSWER THE FCKING QUESTION GHOST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]