Re: abundance of irrationals
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Leroy Quet: "Re: Guess the Permutation"
- Previous message: Leroy Quet: "Re: Guess the Permutation\"
- In reply to: mueckenh_at_rz.fh-augsburg.de: "Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Next in thread: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:02:10 +0000
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
> I have not
> introduced the argument that there are no irrationals at all, but
> accepted that there may be as much as you desire:
No. Whether anyone desires it or not, there are uncountably many
irrationals. You have not accepted that. Your non-acceptance
tells us nothing about numbers but much about your intellectual limits.
> In any case there are
> not more than rationals.
No.
> (In fact, there is none, but that does not matter.)
No. There are (uncountably many) irrational numbers.
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: Leroy Quet: "Re: Guess the Permutation"
- Previous message: Leroy Quet: "Re: Guess the Permutation\"
- In reply to: mueckenh_at_rz.fh-augsburg.de: "Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Next in thread: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: abundance of irrationals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|