Re: Ramanujan
From: Dave Seaman (dseaman_at_no.such.host)
Date: 01/14/05
- Next message: Marcel: "Re: prime number question"
- Previous message: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: too much information!"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Ramanujan"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Ramanujan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:20:25 +0000 (UTC)
On 14 Jan 2005 21:53:23 +0100, Torkel Franzen wrote:
> bryant_j_j@yahoo.com writes:
>> since it was not mainstream maths he must've
>> initially thought the guy to be some sort of cranck.
> No he didn't. He says nobody could have made up those formulas.
But perhaps it took a Hardy to recognize that fact. Apparently Ramanujan had
attempted to communicate with some other mathematicians and had received no
reply.
-- Dave Seaman Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. <http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
- Next message: Marcel: "Re: prime number question"
- Previous message: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: too much information!"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Ramanujan"
- Next in thread: David Kastrup: "Re: Ramanujan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]