Re: You pedantic ignoramuses

From: |-|erc (h_at_r.c)
Date: 01/14/05 

Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:52:26 +1000

> >> How many reals?
> >
> > Well that's almost a sentence.
> >
> > Herc
> >
>
> It's also a question.
>
> How many reals?

You've watched one to many John Wayne movies, questions are a
subtype of sentences.

Herc

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory
    ... > This is going to look a little silly, but Herc has given me an idea. ... > one can represent the level 2 sets as level 1 set binaries: ... This is going to look even sillier, ... rationals being 'single-threaded' and the reals being 'multi-threaded'. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory
    ... In sci.math, ken quirici ... >> This is going to look a little silly, but Herc has given me an idea. ... if one has a monotonic sequence ... However, the reals *are* closed. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory
    ... >> This is going to look a little silly, but Herc has given me an idea. ... You asked us to consider a mapping from N to R, ... But from a computability standpoint R is denumerable, ... And of course the IEE754 approximation only has about 2^64 reals, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: BEHOLD....... PROOF THAT *CARDINALITY IS BONKERS*
    ... > every finite prefix of digits ... You mean a list of decimal expansions of reals, ... > 2/ the diagonal is any real with random digits. ... The number has no way of knowing that Herc ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: You pedantic ignoramuses
    ... > How many reals? ... You've watched one to many John Wayne movies, ... subtype of sentences. ... Herc ...
    (sci.logic)