Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology"
genkisaito_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/16/05
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: too much information!"
- Previous message: The Trucker: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Next in thread: Herman Jurjus: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: Herman Jurjus: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Jan 2005 15:43:28 -0800
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> A lot of lay people get enjoyment from Mathematics. A lot of lay
> people find a lot of things in the arts to be incomprehensible. Even
> in sports[1] you find only half a dozen games with a popular
> following.
>
> [1] At least in the USA.
You know you are losing your argument, don't you?
Compare the number of people who enjoy the music of Mozart
and the number of people who enjoy class field theory
(if you know what it means).
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: too much information!"
- Previous message: The Trucker: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Next in thread: Herman Jurjus: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: Herman Jurjus: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: On Hardy's essay: "A mathematician's apology""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|