Re: True = [ proven | provable ]
From: Ogie Ogelthorpe (boogieloogie_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: Mitch Harris: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Reply: David McAnally: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:29:37 -0400
|-|erc wrote:
> Mathematicians don't need the word true.
>
> For "I think its true" say "I think its provable".
>
> For "G is true" say "G is proven"
>
< snipped the rest of the useless drivel>
The only thing true is that you are a certified nut job who should be
locked up before you hurt yourself or someone else.
Ogie
- Next message: Mitch Harris: "Re: THIS STATEMENT HAS NO PROOF IN ANY SYSTEM = true or false?"
- Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Next in thread: |-|erc: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Reply: |-|erc: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Reply: David McAnally: "Re: True = [ proven | provable ]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
